by DarkSnow » Thu Jan 19, 2006 7:49 am
Thanks for both the comments.
As of right now the chm only contains the specifics from qc specs. I thought it would be good to have as a basis to start from.
Populating it with better definitions from the wiki is a great idea, thanks.
In the future i will include documentation on the extensions aswell, la - thanks for bringning it up.
_____
Is the layout done well? Or are there some parts whitch needs improvement?
I think its easier to read/nav in the chm compared to the web specs, but i still think it could be better. Im open for any suggestions.