QuAdEd

by **FrikaC** » Sun Feb 04, 2007 2:32 am

Huge, obtrusive, redundant screenshot!

by **Entar** » Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:05 am

If nothing else, you can always just use CIA-1, which seems to be pretty popular, and works well.

by **FrikaC** » Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:38 pm

We already went through this, it's too involved to bother for something so meaningless.

by **FrikaC** » Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:07 am

I'm starting to doubt if I should continue QuAdEd at all, it's really shoddily put together (I've been thinking about how much easier some of it would've been had I used C++, it's actually kinda object oriented already, in a weird sort of way, but it would really benefit from some added uniformity)

by **frag.machine** » Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:54 pm

by **FrikaC** » Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:39 pm

by **Urre** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:47 am

by **Quake Matt** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:51 pm

by **Up2nOgOoD[ROCK]** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:36 pm

by **FrikaC** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:20 pm

by **leileilol** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:50 pm

by **FrikaC** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:49 am

I could do it, but it's not how fimg thinks of a wad nor is it the way quaded will ultimately work. I think Quaded will use the farc 'interpretation' of a wad, ie, the correct way to think of it - as an archive containing mip & lmp files (among other things, palettes, raws etc)

Fimg's hacked on wad crap made it interpret a wad as an animated image format, which is bizarre and silly. The task you mention is "Export the first frame of every image group as a separate file using the group name as the file" in terms of a Fimg command, which is really kind of odd. Unless you want it to export .mip files, then I might be with you on that one.

by **Up2nOgOoD[ROCK]** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:33 am

Well, as any format. Exporting as .pcx would be easist for me, but anything will reduce the workload ultimately =)

QuAdEd

Who is online