GoldQuake : Improved WinQuake

by **Error** » Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:51 am

I have the executable if FrikaC doesn't mind me posting it.

by **revelator** » Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:02 am

nice

looking forward to seing it in action.

btw was thinking if allegro might be a better alternative to the now aged mgl since allegro is still actively developed ?

by **dreadlorde** » Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:16 pm

by **metlslime** » Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:45 pm

by **Sajt** » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:36 am

by **revelator** » Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:58 pm

by **ceriux** » Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:17 am

by **Sajt** » Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:33 am

My internet access was not working for about a week and a half, but I finally have that sorted out and committed some now-old stuff to the SVN yesterday. ()

I'm not exactly sure when I'll make a release for GoldQuake. I guess I could make unofficial "beta" builds from the SVN if people were interested, but there's not a whole lot there yet that is noticeable to players.

by **ceriux** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:26 pm

by **Sajt** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:31 pm

by **ceriux** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:13 pm

by **Dr. Shadowborg** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:52 am

by **Sajt** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:40 am

See here for a list of (hopefully) all practical differences between WinQuake and GoldQuake.

by mh » Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:21 am

One suggestion. I see that you've changed the default for sv_aim to disabled. I'm not sure if I like the idea of changes to defaults that affect gameplay behaviour (a full discussion on that would be a matter for a separate thread though).

by **c0burn** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:03 pm

As far as I'm concerned for a PC engine sv_aim and +mlook can be nuked from orbit - (C) Aliens.

GoldQuake : Improved WinQuake

Who is online