Hooray, submitting is so easy now

« A question about how Quaddicted.com is being run || 52! The Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything! »

## Hooray, submitting is so easy now

Alllllriiight! Here we are with a big bunch of new descriptions, but wait a second – there is something much more important to announce:

Thanks to Sajt there now is an incredible fantastic breath-taking online-description-generator!
Yes, I did not directly link to it. Please read the text on the contribute page.

And here we go, all created with the new script, RAWR!
azspq1, borax, eyesock, fatal-error, fatalpla, fbreak, grunt, icbm, imp1sp1, imp1sp2, jamie, jdungeon, ls, mescalito, ncroseum, onepair, opcondor, phantom, pyro1, pyro2, raz, rettear, runerun, scorn, shoradar, slaughtr, trail73

3 by neg!ke, the rest by yours truly. Remember to press F5 if your browser does show an old cached page.

17.08.2007 in Quake Map Descriptions | 5 Comments »

### 5 Responses to “Hooray, submitting is so easy now”

1. sielwolf Says:
   21.08.2007 18:42

   Great work by Sajt, and good to read some new reviews.

   One point: as MadFox mentioned on Func_ maybe you´re being a little bit too subjective, rating the maps more regarding built quality and detail.

   For example Shoradar: rated “crap”, IMO it´s an ok oldskool map, not very good looking and sure annoying, but very challenging to play; I like that.

   It´d be nice to have 2nd opinions on the reviews rather than editing the ones already there.

2. Spirit Says:
   21.08.2007 19:11

   Sure, just go ahead and submit a new one. :)
   (You are right, Crap is too low for it. I’m such a bitter person these days. :\ )

   In discussion with Madfox I noticed that the descriptions are very subjective indeed. I’ll try to change that a bit. It’s hard to please when it’s up to my choice how I do it and there is basically no feedback.

3. sielwolf Says:
   21.08.2007 19:34

   “Sure, just go ahead and submit a new one.”

   I did, but I still see the old description ?!

4. Spirit Says:
   21.08.2007 19:36

   “It will be save in a queue folder waiting to be added. I will try to update the site as often as possible, at least weekly.” ;)

5. neg|ke Says:
   21.08.2007 20:21

   Yeah, careful with “crap”. It’s a thin line between “poor” and “crap” sometimes, but I think the latter rating should only apply if the map is really bad in several aspects – in a big-box-with-200-shamblers-kind of way.

   I usually try to be a bit more forgiving if the map shows promise and follows some (any) recognizable theme. Most 1996-98 maps are just average at best, however some are quite nice even if they don’t match today’s (or let’s say 2000+) standards.

### Leave a Reply

Name

Mail (will not be published)

Website